Skip to main content

Mansfield Park - Book Review #?

Horrible moment of soul-baring honesty...I read this book on my ipad.  It was free in ibooks (many books are free on there - you should check, but only if you don't have a graphic on the lower right hand column of your blog that says "I PLEDGE TO READ THE PRINTED WORD" - oh the shame.)

Anyway, perhaps it was because of the guilt associated (although I read The Jungle Book on the ipad and absolutely loved it - for some reason I'd never read the original - but I digress) this book seemed to be unedited.  I'll need to do some research but I'll tell you, it was like reading someone's rambling thoughts, and then apparently someone told her "Hey, finish this up today" so she did.  The ending was quick, boring, and quite unsatisfactory.  It was like watching a Disney Princess movie, and skipping out on the essential 10 minutes of true love at the end, and going straight to the line "and they lived happily ever after."  Weird.  

But far be it from me to criticize English Lit.

Comments

  1. Probably the only time I will ever say this, but it's quite possible that in this instance, the movie is better than the book.
    I've tried to read the book before & never could get into it. The movie, however, is my favorite movie of all time! The Frances O'Connor one, not the Billie Piper one (blech). I love it so, so, so much. And for some reason, the ending really works the way they do it in the movie. I can see how it wouldn't work as well in the book. Books are longer and more laborious, therefore their endings should be as well.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Okay I need to watch it then. And I love the word "laborious" in this context. If I were to write a jacket cover blurb for this book it would definitely include the word "laborious".

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Name Ideas Please

Exercising with Dad and enjoying her mini slinky. Ok, some of you had some, uh, interesting name choices for our new little one. We will have an ultrasound before Christmas, so then we can start narrowing it down, but does anyone have some REAL ideas? We like short uncomplicated names with meaning. We don't like names that remind us of lousy people or strange celebrities, and none of those weird new names that people our age are naming their kids, like "Christman" or something. (That is a real name - I know a little girl AND a little boy named that. It is pronounced like Christmas, only not.) So yeah, give us some ideas. Does anyone like "Paul"? Is that too old sounding? What about Ana for a girl? Hmmm...

GRAND PRIZE

Ok, we decided - if we pick the name you suggested, you will receive... 1) an autographed portrait of Haley (we realize that isn't very relevant, but we have some extras - ha ha!) 2) the honor of setting up a trust fund for the new baby, minimum starting amount $500 3) a call on the first day the new baby says his/her name 4) a shout out on the BLOG!!! YESSSSS!!! We are of course extremely generous - please don't be astounded by the magnitude of these prizes. Good luck everyone!!

Baby Names

Just in case it is a girl, which we are actually pretty sure it will be, here are some options we are thinking about - let us know what you think. These are our top five. 1) Maude 2) Hortense 3) Magda 4) Dorcas 5) Zipporah